Calls are growing for the court to expedite its decision on the bail request of ManHee Lee, 95, chairman of Shincheonji Church of Jesus, who was arrested and indicted on charges of violating the Political Parties Act. More than two months have passed since he applied for bail, yet the court has not issued a ruling. Advocates argue that his health and human rights should be taken into account, particularly as his detention has been suspended six times due to medical concerns.
They contend that, rather than repeatedly granting temporary releases for medical treatment, the court should consider bail as a way to provide more stable access to care while allowing the trial to proceed.
According to legal sources, 102 days had passed since Chairman Lee’s arrest on June 24. He applied for bail on 4th August, and a hearing was held on 21st August, but no decision had been announced at the time of reporting.
Chairman Lee has reportedly received six suspensions of detention for health-related reasons. He is currently receiving hospital treatment under a temporary release arrangement, which was scheduled to remain in effect until 6pm on 7th October. Recently, a group of external medical specialists reportedly submitted a joint opinion to the court stating that “Chairman ManHee Lee needs treatment at a specialised medical institution through immediate bail or conditional release.”
Article 55 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure stipulates that, “unless there are special circumstances, the court shall make a decision on the matter within seven days from the date of receiving a request for bail or cancellation of detention.”
Kyung-sik Oh, a professor in the Department of Law at Kangwon National University, described the prolonged delay in deciding the bail request as “an unusual case” and called for a swift ruling that considers Chairman Lee’s health and circumstances.
“If there is no risk of flight and detention has been suspended repeatedly for medical treatment, it seems entirely feasible to grant bail,” Professor Oh said. He also highlighted the human rights and administrative challenges of detaining and arranging medical care for elderly inmates.
Sang-kyum Kim, an emeritus professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of Law, also urged the court to decide promptly, citing Chairman Lee’s advanced age and chronic illness. Referring to the constitutional right to a speedy trial, he emphasised that judicial discretion must remain within legal limits and that the reasons for bail decisions should be clearly explained.
In response to questions about the delay, an official from the Seoul Central District Court explained, “In practice, there are cases in which a decision is made a considerable amount of time after the bail hearing.”
Meanwhile, on 28th September, the 27th Criminal Division of the Seoul Central District Court, presided over by Judge In-seong Woo, held a second preliminary hearing in the case involving Chairman Lee and others. The defendants face charges including violations of the Political Parties Act and obstruction of business, relating to allegations that believers were pressured to join the People Power Party.
During the hearing, Chairman Lee’s defence attorney stated, “We admit to all charges regarding party membership but deny all charges regarding coercion.” The defence acknowledged the membership-related facts while maintaining that no organised coercion had taken place.
The court scheduled the next preliminary hearing for 6th October. Future proceedings are expected to address the main case, whether an assessment of the defendant’s cognitive abilities is necessary, and whether the case should be consolidated with a separate indictment.
Source: vo.la/1YujVWX
















